Unbalanced matching markets with short preference lists may not have very unequal stable matchings, by Kanoria, Min, and Qian

Unbalanced matching markets with short preference lists may not have very unequal stable matchings, by Kanoria, Min, and Qian - Hallo friend American jobs and vicinity, In the article you read this time with the title Unbalanced matching markets with short preference lists may not have very unequal stable matchings, by Kanoria, Min, and Qian, we have prepared well for this article you read and download the information therein. hopefully fill posts Article bank, Article contracting, Article general, Article health, Article manufacturing, Article marketing, Article teachers, Article telecommunications, Article The latest, we write this you can understand. Well, happy reading.

Title : Unbalanced matching markets with short preference lists may not have very unequal stable matchings, by Kanoria, Min, and Qian
link : Unbalanced matching markets with short preference lists may not have very unequal stable matchings, by Kanoria, Min, and Qian

Read also


Unbalanced matching markets with short preference lists may not have very unequal stable matchings, by Kanoria, Min, and Qian

Here's a new paper exploring what happens when unbalanced matching markets (with unequal numbers of participants on opposite sides) also have short preference lists, so that each individual has preferences over only a potentially small fraction of possible mates.

Which Random Matching Markets Exhibit a Stark Effect of Competition?
Yash Kanoria, Seungki Min, Pengyu Qian

"We revisit the popular random matching market model introduced by Knuth (1976) and Pittel (1989), and shown by Ashlagi, Kanoria and Leshno (2013) to exhibit a "stark effect of competition", i.e., with any difference in the number of agents on the two sides, the short side agents obtain substantially better outcomes. We generalize the model to allow "partially connected" markets with each agent having an average degree d in a random (undirected) graph. Each agent has a (uniformly random) preference ranking over only their neighbors in the graph. We characterize stable matchings in large markets and find that the short side enjoys a significant advantage only for d exceeding (log^2 n where n is the number of agents on one side: For moderately connected markets with  d=o(log^2 n), we find that there is no stark effect of competition, with agents on both sides getting a sqrt(d)  ranked partner on average. Notably, this regime extends far beyond the connectivity threshold of d=Θ(logn). In contrast, for densely connected markets with d=ω(log2n), we find that the short side agents get logn-ranked partner on average, while the long side agents get a partner of (much larger) rank d/logn on average. Numerical simulations of our model confirm and sharpen our theoretical predictions. Since preference list lengths in most real-world matching markets are much below (log^2 n), our findings may help explain why available datasets do not exhibit a strong effect of competition."


Thus Article Unbalanced matching markets with short preference lists may not have very unequal stable matchings, by Kanoria, Min, and Qian

that is all articles Unbalanced matching markets with short preference lists may not have very unequal stable matchings, by Kanoria, Min, and Qian This time, hopefully can provide benefits to all of you. Okay, see you in another article post.

You now read the article Unbalanced matching markets with short preference lists may not have very unequal stable matchings, by Kanoria, Min, and Qian with the link address https://americanjobsandvicinity.blogspot.com/2020/08/unbalanced-matching-markets-with-short.html

Subscribe to receive free email updates:

0 Response to "Unbalanced matching markets with short preference lists may not have very unequal stable matchings, by Kanoria, Min, and Qian"

Post a Comment